Quadratic Graphs Without X-Intercepts: Finding 'm'
When we talk about the graph of a quadratic equation, like , we're essentially looking at a parabola. This U-shaped curve can either open upwards or downwards, and its position relative to the x-axis tells us a lot about its roots or x-intercepts. An x-intercept is simply a point where the graph crosses or touches the x-axis. At these points, the y-value is zero. So, finding the x-intercepts means solving the equation . The question at hand is: for what values of does the graph of have no x-intercepts? This means we're looking for a scenario where the parabola never touches or crosses the x-axis. To tackle this, we need to delve into the discriminant of a quadratic equation. The discriminant, denoted by , is a crucial part of the quadratic formula and is calculated as . It tells us about the nature of the roots (solutions) of the quadratic equation . If , there are two distinct real roots, meaning the parabola intersects the x-axis at two different points. If , there is exactly one real root (a repeated root), meaning the parabola touches the x-axis at its vertex. If , there are no real roots, which means the parabola does not intersect the x-axis at all. This last case is precisely what we're interested in for our problem. In the given equation, , we can identify the coefficients: , , and . We want the graph to have no x-intercepts, so we need the discriminant to be less than zero: . Let's substitute the coefficients into the discriminant formula: . Simplifying this expression, we get , which further simplifies to . Now, we set this discriminant to be less than zero, as per our requirement for no x-intercepts: . To find the values of that satisfy this inequality, we first subtract 25 from both sides: . Then, we divide both sides by 8: . So, the graph of will have no x-intercepts when is less than . It's also important to consider that for the equation to be a quadratic equation in the first place, the coefficient of the term, which is , cannot be zero. If , the equation becomes , which is a linear equation. A linear equation of the form where will always have exactly one x-intercept (when , , so ). In our case, if , , which has an x-intercept at . Therefore, must not be zero. Our condition already ensures that is not zero, as is a negative number. Thus, the condition is sufficient. This mathematical journey, rooted in the properties of quadratic equations and their discriminants, leads us to a clear understanding of when a parabola will abstain from crossing the horizontal axis. It's a fundamental concept in algebra that helps us visualize and interpret the behavior of these curves.
Understanding the Discriminant
The discriminant is a fundamental component of the quadratic formula, which is used to find the roots of a quadratic equation in the standard form . The quadratic formula itself is given by . As you can see, the expression under the square root sign, , plays a pivotal role in determining the nature and number of solutions (roots) for the equation. This expression, , is what we call the discriminant, often denoted by the Greek letter delta (). Its value provides critical insights into how the graph of the quadratic function interacts with the x-axis. Let's break down the three possible scenarios for the discriminant:
-
(Discriminant is positive): When the discriminant is positive, the term yields a real, non-zero number. This means the quadratic formula will produce two distinct real values for : and . Geometrically, this signifies that the parabola representing the quadratic function intersects the x-axis at two distinct points. These are the two x-intercepts.
-
(Discriminant is zero): If the discriminant is zero, then . In this case, the quadratic formula simplifies to , resulting in only one real value for : . This single root is often referred to as a repeated root or a double root. Graphically, this indicates that the parabola touches the x-axis at precisely one point. This point is the vertex of the parabola, and it lies on the x-axis.
-
(Discriminant is negative): When the discriminant is negative, the term involves the square root of a negative number. In the realm of real numbers, the square root of a negative number is undefined. Therefore, there are no real solutions for . This means the parabola does not intersect the x-axis at all. The entire parabola lies either above the x-axis (if ) or below the x-axis (if ). In the context of complex numbers, there would be two complex conjugate roots, but for graphical interpretations on a real coordinate plane, we focus on real roots.
In our specific problem, , we have , , and . We are looking for the condition where the graph has no x-intercepts. Based on our understanding of the discriminant, this corresponds to the case where . Calculating the discriminant for this equation gives us . To ensure no x-intercepts, we must have . Solving this inequality for yields , and consequently, . This rigorous examination of the discriminant's role solidifies our answer and provides a comprehensive understanding of why this condition is necessary.
The Role of 'm' as a Coefficient
The coefficient '' in the quadratic equation is not just an arbitrary number; it is the leading coefficient, and it profoundly influences the shape and orientation of the parabola. Understanding its role is crucial for analyzing the graph's behavior, especially concerning its x-intercepts. As we've established, the condition for the graph to have no x-intercepts relies on the discriminant being negative (). However, we must also remember that for the equation to represent a parabola (a quadratic function), the coefficient of the term, which is , cannot be zero. If , the equation degenerates into a linear equation: . A linear function, unless it's a horizontal line (, where ), will always intersect the x-axis at exactly one point. For , setting gives , leading to . This is a single x-intercept. Therefore, the initial assumption that we are dealing with a quadratic requires . Our derived condition for no x-intercepts is . This inequality inherently satisfies the requirement that , because is a negative value, and any number less than it will also be negative and thus non-zero. This means that all values of less than will result in a parabola that opens downwards (since ) and is positioned such that it never touches the x-axis. If were positive, the parabola would open upwards. However, even if , the condition might still be met, leading to an upward-opening parabola that is entirely above the x-axis. For instance, if , , so it has two x-intercepts. If , . The critical value we found, , represents the boundary. When is exactly , , and the parabola touches the x-axis at its vertex. For values of slightly greater than (but still negative, e.g., ), would be positive (), leading to two x-intercepts. Conversely, for values of less than (e.g., ), is negative (), resulting in no x-intercepts. Thus, the value of dictates not only whether there are x-intercepts but also the general orientation and position of the parabolic graph relative to the x-axis, playing a dual role in defining the quadratic's behavior. It's this interplay between the leading coefficient and the constant and linear terms that provides the rich analysis possible with quadratic functions.
Conclusion: The Boundary Case and Final Answer
We have rigorously explored the conditions under which the quadratic equation will have no x-intercepts. The key to solving this problem lies in understanding the discriminant () of a quadratic equation, which is given by . For a quadratic equation to have no real roots (and therefore, its graph to have no x-intercepts), the discriminant must be negative, i.e., . In our specific equation, we identified the coefficients as , , and . Plugging these into the discriminant formula, we obtained . Setting this inequality to be less than zero, we get . Solving this inequality, we first subtract 25 from both sides to get . Then, dividing by 8, we arrive at the condition .
It is crucial to remember that for the original equation to represent a quadratic function (a parabola), the coefficient of the term, , must not be equal to zero (). If , the equation becomes linear (), which always has one x-intercept. Our derived condition, , ensures that is always negative and thus never zero. Therefore, this condition is both necessary and sufficient for the graph to have no x-intercepts.
Let's briefly examine the boundary case where . In this situation, the discriminant is . A discriminant of zero means the parabola touches the x-axis at exactly one point (the vertex). So, is the threshold value where the graph transitions from having two x-intercepts to none.
For values of greater than (but still potentially negative, like ), the discriminant would be positive, resulting in two x-intercepts. For values of less than (like ), the discriminant is negative, leading to no x-intercepts.
Thus, the values of for which the graph of has no x-intercepts are precisely those where . This corresponds to option B.
For further exploration into quadratic functions and their properties, you can refer to resources like the Khan Academy Mathematics section on Quadratics.